Today I will be writing about an event in history called
Manifest Destiny, which took place around 1845-1860. Basically what Manifest Destiny was that the
people who were expanding into America felt that taking the land from the
people living there was justified and that the US was meant to own that land.
Historians say that manifest destiny was an idea mostly adopted by Democrats.
The Whigs were against the fighting conquest of America.
I found the
whole idea of manifest destiny quite fascinating actually. The idea that
somehow, by living where they were born, the Native Americans were keeping the
settlers from having land that was “rightfully theirs.” In my opinion I don’t
think that what the American settlers did to take over the land was justified
at all. Looking back it’s hard to say whether it was inevitable or not since we
now have taken over all of the land. At the same time, expanding and concurring
is part of being a growing country. So I don’t think there is particularly anything
wrong with going to war for a piece of land because you want to expand. The problem
comes from killing people for being on land that you think should be yours and
say that it gives you the right to control in before you’ve won it.
I like your opinion of Manifest Destiny. Did you note the irony that the day you posted this, it was the 15th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the US? How was that similar? How was it different?
ReplyDelete